Then in 2016, Donald Trump won the Electoral College despite receiving 2.1% less of the popular vote. Third, defenders of the Electoral College also claim that it supports the underlying value of federalism. That might invite legal challenges from candidates or voters' groups if it took place. The cost of conducting a nationwide recount could be hundreds of millions of dollars, which is money that may not always be in the budget. Despite California having millions of more people living in the state compared to Wyoming, the weight of a vote is 30% less. This isnt rocket science. It gives a slight edge to candidates with broad-based support in many states over those who rack up huge majorities in just a few large states. Abolishing The Electoral College Would Be More Complicated Than - NPR Is the way Americans choose the president undemocratic and unfair? This action would allow the popular vote winner to take the White House. If the U.S. were to abolish the electoral college, then the restrictions that territories experience against voting in this election would disappear. The election, as Mr. Trump would say though not for the right reasons is rigged. A number of states have signed onto a pact that guarantees their Electoral College votes to the winner of the popular vote, no matter the outcome in their individual states. There is a trigger for NPV to go into effect, and we are creeping ever closer toward it.10 When enough states have entered the compact to reach a majority of the electoral votes270 out of 538the compact will then kick in. If the Electoral College system begins to prevent, on a regular basis, the popular vote winner from becoming president, it will create systemic challenges. It can be fixed. In fact, there is already a movement brewing among states to agree to award their electors to whichever candidate wins the national popular vote. In most cases this should prevent the popular vote loser from becoming president. Having this structure go away would encourage more third-party development. Another 15 legislatures with varying degrees of Republican control would also need to ratify such an amendment for the Electoral College to be removed. Its possible the Supreme Court will ultimately decide who gets to decide how individual electors vote. There are millions of Republicans in deep-blue states, like Massachusetts and California. So, let me make the case for its abolition and its replacement by a simple national popular vote, to be held in an entity we will call (what the heck) the United States of America. This issue exists in the Electoral College when the rural states face off with the urban ones. Some of the most important framers, including James Madison and James Wilson, wanted to write a direct popular vote into the Constitution. We need to think hard, and quickly, about how to reform three aspects of the presidential nomination process: the debates, the primary elections and the conventions. Under these laws, which states adopted to gain political advantage in the nations early years, even though it was never raised by the framers states award all their electors to the candidate with the most popular votes in their state. A plan to scrap the Electoral College via constitutional amendment would not pass in the current environment. In the first instance, states could decide to award 2 Electoral College votes (EVs) to the winner of the national popular vote (NPV) and the remainder to the winner of the state. Changing or eliminating the Electoral College can be accomplished only by an amendment to the Constitution, which requires the consent of two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states.
Law Of Attraction Ruined My Life,
Practice 8 1 Translations Answer Key,
Articles W