Armitage believes that if dinosaurs have soft tissue in their bones, then something is wrong with the belief system that says the world is billions of years old. At least six possible explanations (including bacterial contaminants) have been suggested for this preservation of soft tissue in dinosaur bones, but they have all been refuted (Thomas, 2019). A chemical framework for the preservation of fossil vertebrate cells and soft tissues (Landon A. Anderson, Earth Science Reviews, May 2023 issue). Rare 95-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Skull Uncovered in Australia. How did scientists find soft tissue in dinosaur fossils? It weighed 8 kg (18 pounds). Amino acid sequencing of several samples have shown matches with the known collagens of chickens, frogs, newts and other animals. to explain how it could last tens of millions of years. But people like her never seem to question their deep time evolutionary assumptions. Where they should be three separate bones, these bones have grown together, Carrano said. In short, he argues that because we know that fossil fuels, coalified wood and invertebrate fossils are tens or hundreds of millions of years old, whats the problem with accepting dinosaur soft tissue being that old as well? And Schweitzer has even recovered fragments of the more fragile and complex molecule, DNA. 2017: the study done in 2009 was repeated in order to answer critics. [13] The extraction of protein, soft tissue, remnant cells and organelle-like structures from dinosaur fossils has been confirmed. Give me time in the future and all your doubts will fall. Radiometric dating isn't the only method of determining the age of rocks. That idea is not considered by LAA. Editor's Note: This article was updated at 2pm Eastern Nov. 28 to correct unclear language about proteins and DNA. Bye-bye, dino soft tissue - freethoughtblogs.com Schweitzer's most explosive claim came 2 years later in two papers in Science.
Hca Employee Benefits,
Johnny Van Zant First Wife,
Articles S