If an individual can be d-related to abstract objects, then some properties turn out to be extrinsic which seem intuitively to be intrinsic: for instance, the sugars weighing 1 kilogram is extrinsic if 1 is an abstract object; in fact, all measurement properties would turn out to be extrinsic properties. Such a criterion exploits the fact that properties are causally related to each other and, furthermore, many properties appear to enter into these causal relations essentially: having mass of 1kg is having whatever it is that requires 1N force to accelerate at 1m/s2 in a frictionless environment, and which will create 9 x 1016 Joules of energy when the 1kg mass is destroyed. In Jacobs (ed. If one cares about there being strict identity criteria for each category of entities (Quine 1948), then the former provides non-circular identity criteria for properties (on the assumption that the nature of the relations into which a property enters is not determined by the nature of the property), whereas the latter view does not. (For a selection of metaphysical distinctions between properties, see Sections 6 and 7.). Sider, Theodore. Bird, A. On the other hand, if we accept that an individuals relations to abstract objects cannot make the properties it instantiates d-relational, then indiscriminately necessary properties such as being such that 37 exists all turn out to be intrinsic, and this is another outcome we might hope to avoid. (3) The conceptual fallacy of the notion of fiducial distribution rests upon the lack of recognition that valid probability statements about random variables usually cease to be valid if the random variables are replaced by their particular values. A particular dog could lose a limb or be unable to swim, and it would still count as being a dog. Nevertheless, one might still think that this difference is a difference of degree (Bird 2014, 2). This requirement for identity and individuation criteria for each category is a general one in metaphysicsapplying equally to other categories such as sets, objects and personsbut it is one which has proved problematic in the case of properties because it is a difficult requirement for the property theorist to satisfy. The world appears to contain kinds of stuff as a matter of natural fact: water, elephants, gold, carbon dioxide, humans, red dwarf stars and so on. At this point, the consensus ends and a variety of philosophical questions arise about the nature of properties and their relationship to other entities and each other. Or he might question the example in another way by arguing that such properties are not coextensive anyway, either because they are instantiated by distinct individuals or else because they are relations between different parts of the same individuals.
How To Sell A Horse In Equestrian The Game,
Aquinas' Commentary On Isaiah,
Articles S